1st Circuit

The appeal was dismissed for lack of standing on the part of the appellant since it could not demonstrate that it was in any way "aggrieved" by the bankruptcy court's grant of relief from the automatic stay

Concluding that no legally cognizable grounds for reconsideration were established, the Court affirmed the bankruptcy court's denial of a Rule 60(b) motion, seeking to recognize a late-filed claim. The Court held that under Code sec. 502(b)(9) a claim must ...

Chapter 7 debtor lacked standing to appeal because he could not demonstrate that either (1) a reasonable possibility existed that a surplus would exist if the order on appeal was denied or (2) the appealed order adversely affected his discharge.

Affirming the Bankruptcy court’s denial of discharge pursuant to Section 727(a)(4), agreeing with the bankruptcy court that the debtor’s failure to schedule all of his assets was an intentionally fraudulent act and not the result of the debtor’s self-proclaimed attention ...