The Volo Project is dedicated to providing ABI Members with the most timely bankruptcy decisions from the U.S. Courts of Appeal. A team of member volunteers provide a summary of each new opinion within 24 hours of their release. Each summary includes the full text of the opinion. Members can sign up for email alerts from their circuit, or the whole country! Not a member? Try Volo free for 30 days

Manchester v. Funderburgh (In re Funderburgh)

Citation: 
Manchester v. Funderburgh (In re Funderburgh), 2015 WL 412774 (10th Cir. BAP February 2, 2015)
Ruling: 
The BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court's denial of the debtor's discharge and avoidance of fraudulent transfers, ruling that the bankruptcy trustee was not precluded from asserting the claims by the dismissal "with prejudice" of a duplicate adversary proceeding.
Judge(s): 
Michael, Romero, and Jacobvitz
Read on...

Sazegar v. Jadidolahi (In re Sazegar)

Citation: 
CC-14-1188-TaDPa (9th Cir. BAP February 19, 2015)
Ruling: 
In the unpublished decisions, the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel ("BAP"), the BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court. Rule 7004(b)(9) Fed.R.Bankr.P. provides that service of a motion for stay relief is to be made on the debtor at the address listed ...
Judge(s): 
TAYLOR, DUNN, and PAPPAS, Bankruptcy Judges.
Read on...

Cummings v. UST, Phoenix (In re Cummings)

Citation: 
Cummings v. UST, Phoenix (In re Cummings), 9th Circuit Court of Appeals No. 12-60077, February 10, 2015 [Not for publication]
Ruling: 
The 9th Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy court’s order denying the debtors' discharge on the ground that the debtors made false oaths within the meaning of section 727(a)(4)(A), when the debtors did not disclose their interest in a corporation until they ...
Judge(s): 
TALLMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and DEARIE, Senior District Judge.
Read on...

Baker v. Baker (In the Matter of Baker)

Citation: 
No. 14-10569 (non-precedential)
Ruling: 
Fifth Circuit AFFIRMED lower courts' rulings that bankruptcy court could exercise jurisdiction to interpret and enforce its own prior sale order. District Court further did not commit err by affirming bankruptcy court's denial of the motion to amend a ...
Judge(s): 
KING, DAVIS, and OWEN (per curiam)
Read on...

Securities Invest. Protection Corp. v. 2427 Parent Corp. (In re Bernard L. Madoff Invest. Securities LLC)

Citation: 
Nos. 14‐97‐bk(L) (August Term 2014)
Ruling: 
The Securities Investor Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aaa, et seq. (“SIPA” or “the Act”), does not permit an inflation or interest adjustment to “net equity” claims for customer property.
Judge(s): 
STRAUB, WESLEY, and LIVINGSTON
Read on...
Syndicate content