Home » 11 U.S.C § 549

Harold Jones v. The Brand Law Firm (In re: Alice Belmonte)

  • Summarized by Nascine Howell , Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • 6 years 7 months ago
Citation:
No. 18-2098 (2nd Circuit, Jul 25,2019) Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the bankruptcy court’s decision, finding that the trustee’s recovery of a portion of the proceeds from the debtor’s unauthorized post-petition...
Judge(s):
Calabresi, Lynch and Lohier, Circuit Judges
Tag(s):

Eisenberg v. Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority (In re BX Acquisitions, Inc.)

  • Summarized by Elizabeth Lamphier , U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Michigan
  • 6 years 10 months ago
Citation:
18-8014 (6th Circuit, Apr 19,2019) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
The Sixth Circuit BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court’s ruling (N.D. Ohio) that payments made to county port authority by debtor were authorized by agreed cash collateral orders and thus binding on...
Judge(s):
Harrison (author), Opperman, Wise
Tag(s):

Lewis v. Kaelin (In re Cresta Technology Corp.)

  • Summarized by Alexandra Schnapp , U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Georgia
  • 7 years 10 months ago
Citation:
NC-17-1186-BSTa (9th Circuit, Apr 06,2018) Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
An ordinary check delivered to the creditor pre-petition, but honored post-petition, was transferred on the date of honor for purposes of § 549(a).
Judge(s):
Brand, Spraker, and Taylor
Tag(s):

Spradlin v. Khouri, et al.

  • Summarized by Steven Mulligan , Coan, Payton & Payne, LLC
  • 9 years 1 month ago
Citation:
15-8031 (6th Circuit, Jan 04,2017) Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
When a postpetition transfer completely divests a debtor’s interest in property, that property is not subject to turnover under § 542, but may still be avoided under § 549. If only possession...
Judge(s):
Delk, Humphrey, Opperman (Humphrey)
Tag(s):

Pages

About us in numbers

3923 in the system

3801 Summarized

1 Being Processed