Scott and De La Rosa v. Branch and Patterson (In re Patterson)

Citation:
BAP No. SC-18-1110-LSF (9th Circuit, Apr 17,2019) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
BAP for 9th Cir. affirmed ruling of bankruptcy court (SD Cal.) denying debtors' FRBP 7024/Rule 60(b) motion for reconsideration following bankruptcy court's denial of motion for sanctions for...
Judge(s):
Lafferty, Spraker, Faris
Tag(s):

Roberts v. Livdahl (In re Livdahl)

Citation:
BAP No. AZ-18-1223-TaLB (9th Circuit, Apr 15,2019) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
BAP for 9th Circuit affirmed ruling of bankruptcy court (D. Az.) overruling objection to chapter 11 plan confirmation by secured creditor. Bankruptcy court properly ruled plan was filed in good...
Judge(s):
Taylor, Lafferty, and Brand
Tag(s):

Kang v. Cuzco Development U.S.A., LLC (In re Cuzco Development)

Citation:
BAP No. HI-18-1033-BSL (9th Circuit, Apr 04,2019) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
Bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion when denying requests to extend the deadline by claimant because claimant failed to prove excusable neglect.
Judge(s):
Brand, Spraker, Lafferty
Tag(s):

Barker v. Eiler (In re Principia Equitas)

Citation:
BAP No. OR-18-1128-SKuF (9th Circuit, Mar 28,2019) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
BAP for 9th Circuit affirmed ruling of bankruptcy court (D. Or.) denying non-debtor principal's claim objection against secured creditor who had not filed proof of claim. Secured creditor did not...
Judge(s):
Spraker, Kurtz, Faris
Tag(s):

Raybould v. Markel (In re Raybould)

Citation:
Nos. OR-17-1326-SLB, OR-17-1327-SLB (9th Circuit, Mar 26,2019) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
Bankruptcy case was properly dismissed because debtor failed to obtain credit counseling, to timely make plan payments, and to file required tax returns.
Judge(s):
Spraker, Lafferty, Brand
Tag(s):

Dekhtyar v. Chernyavsky (In re Dekhtyar)

Citation:
BAP No. CC-18-1203-LSF (9th Circuit, Mar 19,2019) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
A state court judgment for malicious prosecution was entitled to preclusive effect so that the debtor's state court malicious prosecution judgment was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6)....
Judge(s):
LAFFERTY, SPRAKER, and FARIS, Bankruptcy Judges
Tag(s):

Singh v, Singh (In re Singh)

Citation:
BAP No. CC-17-1353-FLS (9th Circuit, Mar 14,2019) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
For purposes of § 727(a)(2)(A), "property of the debtor" includes property held by the debtor's alter-ego. Thus, a debtor who used a corporation that conducted a Ponzi scheme in addition to...
Judge(s):
FARIS, LAFFERTY, and SPRAKER, Bankruptcy Judges
Tag(s):

Miller v. Gilliam & Rodriguez (In re Miller)

Citation:
BAP No. CC-18-1267-SFL (9th Circuit, Mar 11,2019) Not Published
Case Status:
Reversed
Ruling:
Ninth Circuit BAP reversed decision of bankruptcy court granting creditor’s Rule 9011 motion for sanctions against chapter 7 debtor, holding that such claim for fees was property of creditor’s...
Judge(s):
Spaker, Faris, and Lafferty
Tag(s):

Pages

About us in numbers

2882 in the system

2819 Summarized

4 Being Processed