WILSON, ET AL. V. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.
- Case Type:
- Consumer
- Case Status:
- Dismissed
- Citation:
- No. 24-6897 (9th Circuit, Feb 05,2026) Not Published
- Tag(s):
-
- Ruling:
- Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292, and 158(d)(1) finding that the order was not final because it did not "end the litigation on the merits," and that the district court did not "certify" the decision for review as required under 28 U.S.C. § 1292.
- Procedural context:
- The bankruptcy court allowed Chase’s claim and eventually granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants on the CPA claim. It also rejected the Wilsons' argument that their obligation to repay the loan had been "suspended".
On appeal, the district court vacated parts of the bankruptcy court's orders and remanded the case for further consideration of the CPA claim and other merits. However, it upheld the ruling that the Wilsons could not raise the "suspended obligation" argument for the first time during summary judgment.
- Facts:
- The Wilsons sued Chase and Quality Loan Service Corporation, alleging violations of the Washington Deed of Trust Act (DTA) and the Consumer Protection Act (CPA).
- Judge(s):
- SCHROEDER, FRIEDLAND, and COLLINS
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign In using your ABI Member credentials. Not a Member yet? Join ABI now - it is absolutely worth it!
