Now Updating
Ballard Spahr LLP v Official Committee of Equity Security Holders

Summarizing by Bradley Pearce

Home » Part III » Rule 3004

DUARTE V. HILLARD, ET AL.

  • Summarized by Jonathan Batiste , Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  • 4 months 1 week ago
Citation:
No. 24-5156 (9th Circuit, Oct 23,2025) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
Creditors must affirmatively demonstrate their intent to enforce claims against debtors before creditor’s claim bar date. Debtors’ schedules do not constitute informal proofs of claim and do...
Judge(s):
Paez, Bea, and Forrest
Tag(s):

Matteson v. Bank Of America (In re Matteson)

  • Summarized by Michael Coury , Glankler Brown, PLLC
  • 10 years 6 months ago
Citation:
15 FED App. 0006P (6th Cir. August 10, 2015)
Ruling:
The Bankruptcy Court erred in reducing mortgage balances by the amount the secured lender would have received under Chapter 13 plan had creditor filed proofs of claim. The Secured creditor's liens...
Judge(s):
Delk, Opperman and Preston
Tag(s):

Keys v. 701 Mariposa Project, LLC

  • Summarized by Joel Newell , Ballard Spahr, LLP
  • 11 years 7 months ago
Citation:
BAP No. CC-13-1329-KuBlPa; In re 701 Mariposa Project, LLC, -- B.R. -- (9th BAP 2014)
Ruling:
The 9th Circuit BAP reversed and remanded the bankruptcy court's decisions wherein the BAP held that even though the Debtor's service of process was defective it did not violation the creditor's...
Judge(s):
Hon. Kurtz; Hon. Blumenstiel (sitting by designation); and Hon. Pappas.
Tag(s):

Spokane Law Enforcement FCU v. Barker (In re Barker)

  • Summarized by Bryan Robinson , Law Offices of Bryan Robinson
  • 11 years 11 months ago
Citation:
In Re Barker, 9th Cir. B.A.P., MT-13-1393-JuKuPa (March 28, 2014) [Unpublished]
Ruling:
In an unpublished opinion, the 9th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed the ruling by the bankruptcy court which held, the bankruptcy court did not have the discretion to allow a late filed...
Judge(s):
JURY, KURTZ, and PAPPAS,
Tag(s):

The Municipality of Carolina v. Gonzalez (In re Gonzalez)

  • Summarized by Guy Moss ,
  • 12 years 10 months ago
Citation:
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit, No. 10-10029-BKT (April 12, 2013)A
Ruling:
Concluding that no legally cognizable grounds for reconsideration were established, the Court affirmed the bankruptcy court's denial of a Rule 60(b) motion, seeking to recognize a late-filed claim....
Judge(s):
Haines, Feeney and Hoffman
Tag(s):

Pages

About us in numbers

3925 in the system

3802 Summarized

1 Being Processed