Williamson v. Murray (In re Murray)

• Summarized by Bryan Robinson , Law Offices of Bryan Robinson
• 10 years 1 month ago

Citation:

Williamson v. Murray (In re Murray), 10th Cir. Court Appeals, No. 14-3054 (BAP No. KS-13-034) (BAP) November 18, 2014

Ruling:

The 10 Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) for the Tenth Circuit and the bankruptcy court which rejected a Chapter 7 trustee’s challenge, to...

Judge(s):

KELLY, LUCERO, and HARTZ, Circuit Judges

Tag(s):

• 10th Circuit
• Administrative Expense Claims
• Consumer Bankruptcy
• Consumer Debt
• Claims
• Bankruptcy Litigation
• Practice and Procedure
• Preferences
• § 541
• § 522
• § 544
• § 704
• § 507

The Bankruptcy Law Firm, PC v. Siegel (In re Waksberg)

• Summarized by David Hercher , U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Oregon
• 10 years 2 months ago

Citation:

In re Waksberg, BAP No. CC-14-1102-DTaSp (9th Cir. B.A.P. Oct. 15, 2014).

Ruling:

Two chapter 7 estates should not be substantively consolidated over the material substantive objection of an administrative claimant against one estate. Not for publication memorandum decision.

Judge(s):

Randall L. Dunn, Laura S. Taylor, and Gary A. Spraker, Bankruptcy Judges. (Judge Spraker, Chief Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Alaska, was sitting by designation.)

Tag(s):

• 9th Circuit
• Administrative Expense Claims

P.R. Electric Power Authority v. Wiscovitch-Rentas

• Summarized by Brendan Gage , Goulston & Storrs PC
• 10 years 3 months ago

Citation:

BAP No. PR 13-050 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. Sept. 23, 2014)

Ruling:

The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel vacated the bankruptcy’s court’s order denying Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority’s motion for payment of administrative expenses and remanded to the...

Judge(s):

Hillman, Hoffman, and Finkle, United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judges.

Tag(s):

• 9th Circuit
• Administrative Expense Claims
• Business Reorganization
• Claims
• Bankruptcy Litigation
• Retail
• Unsecured Trade Creditors
• 9023
• 366
• § 503

Meruelo v. Reorganized Meruelo Maddux Prop., Inc. (In re Meruelo Maddux Prop., Inc.)

• Summarized by Elie Herman ,
• 10 years 4 months ago

Citation:

9th Circuit BAP No. CC-13-1494-KiTaD (August 26, 2014)

Ruling:

The BAP VACATED the order of the bankruptcy court for abuse of discretion in applying the "reasonableness" standard under Section 502(b)(4) to a post-petition claim for administrative expense based...

Judge(s):

Kirscher, Taylor, and Dunn

Tag(s):

• 9th Circuit
• Administrative Expense Claims
• Business Reorganization
• Claims
• Bankruptcy Litigation
• Labor/Employment
• § 502
• § 503

U.S.A. v. Bond

• Summarized by Joel Levitin , Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
• 10 years 5 months ago

Citation:

Docket No. 12-4803-bk (2d Cir. August 13, 2014)

Ruling:

The bankruptcy court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to decide a tax refund claim because the liquidating trustee appointed pursuant to the Debtors' confirmed plan of reorganization did not...

Judge(s):

Jacobs, Sack, and Lohier

Tag(s):

• 2nd Circuit
• Administrative Expense Claims
• Bankruptcy Taxation
• Bankruptcy Litigation
• Legislation
• Practice and Procedure
• Venue/Jurisdiction
• § 1123
• § 505
• § 546
• § 1107

Law v. Siegel (In re Law)

• Summarized by Lovee Sarenas , Sklar Hirsh
• 10 years 5 months ago

Citation:

Not for Publication

Ruling:

The panel affirmed the bankruptcy court's allowance and authorization to pay pro rata the final fees and costs of the estate's professionals over the objection of the Debtor in various stages of...

Judge(s):

Honorable Judges Randall Dunn, Ralph Kirscher and Laura Taylor.

Tag(s):

• 9th Circuit
• Administrative Expense Claims
• Consumer Bankruptcy
• Bankruptcy Litigation
• Professional Compensation/Fees
• Rule 8005
• Rule 2016
• § 330

In re ID Liquidation One, LLC, et al.

• Summarized by Eduardo Glas , Law Office of Eduardo Glas PC
• 10 years 10 months ago

Citation:

Case No. 13-3386 (3rd Cir. Feb. 19, 2014)

Ruling:

Third Circuit affirmed order entered by the district court affirming the Bankruptcy Court's order approving a settlement under Fed.R.Bankr. P. 9019

Judge(s):

McKee, Chagares and Shwartz

Tag(s):

• 3rd Circuit
• Administrative Expense Claims
• Bankruptcy Litigation
• Practice and Procedure

Stalnaker v. Allison, et al. (In re Tri-State Financial, LLC)

• Summarized by Omid Moezzi ,
• 10 years 11 months ago

Citation:

B.A.P. 8th Cir. (February 5, 2014)

Ruling:

Reverse and remand by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel to the bankruptcy court to consider creditors and trustee's arguments.

Judge(s):

Kressel, Schermer, and Nail.

Tag(s):

• 8th Circuit
• Administrative Expense Claims

Raj Kamal Corp., et al. v. Fukushima (In re Raj Kamal Corp.)

• Summarized by Lars Fuller , BakerHostetler
• 11 years 3 weeks ago

Citation:

Raj Kamal Corp., et al. v. Fukushima (In re Raj Kamal Corp.), BAP No. EC-12-1648 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Dec. 17, 2013)

Ruling:

Ninth Circuit BAP affirmed bankruptcy court's (E.D. California) order denying compensation to attorney for services rendered to Chapter 11 debtor and requiring disgorgement of all funds received. ...

Judge(s):

Kirscher, Pappas, Jury

Tag(s):

• 9th Circuit
• Administrative Expense Claims
• Practice and Procedure
• Professional Compensation/Fees
• 2014
• 327
• § 330

Munce's Superior Petroleum Products, Inc. v. N.H. Department of Environmental Services (In re Munce's Superior Petroleum Products, Inc.)

• Summarized by Michael Sugar , Commonwealth of Massachusetts
• 11 years 1 month ago

Citation:

No. 13-1380

Ruling:

The First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the bankruptcy court's finding that a post-petition civil contempt award issued against Munce's Superior Petroleum Products, Inc. (the "Debtor") in favor...

Judge(s):

Lynch, Selya, & Hillman (sitting by designation from D. Mass.). Opinion by Lynch

Tag(s):

• 1st Circuit
• Administrative Expense Claims

Pages

• …
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10
• …
• previous
• next