Home » Bankruptcy Process and Procedure » Bankruptcy Litigation

GE Capital Commercial, Inc. v. Sylva Corp (In re Sylva Corp)

  • Summarized by Lars Fuller , BakerHostetler
  • 11 years 6 months ago
Citation:
GE Capital Commercial, Inc. v. Sylva Corp (In re Sylva Corp), No. 14-61016 (BAP 8th Cir. Nov. 26, 2014)
Ruling:
The BAP for the 8th Circuit reversed and remanded to the bankruptcy court (D. Minn.) after the bankruptcy court denied an equipment lessor's motion for administrative expense claim. The BAP ruled...
Judge(s):
Federman, Saladino, Shodeen
Tag(s):

Bavelis v. Doukas (In re Bavelis)

  • Summarized by Dean Langdon , DelCotto Law Group PLLC
  • 11 years 6 months ago
Citation:
Docket No. 14-3067; File name 14a0284p.06
Ruling:
Affirming the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (which affirmed the Bankruptcy Court), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals rules that the Bankruptcy Court had constitutional authority to...
Judge(s):
Batchelder, Gilman and Gibbons; opinion by Gilman
Tag(s):

Rivera v. Deutsche Bank (In re Rivera)

  • Summarized by Bruce Weiner , Rosenberg, Musso & Weiner
  • 11 years 6 months ago
Citation:
NC-13-4615
Ruling:
Ninth Circuit BAP affirmed in part and reversed in part bankruptcy court's order dismissing debtors' second amended complaint against the bank challenging the mortgage on the debtors' property. The...
Judge(s):
Kurtz, Pappas & Jury
Tag(s):

Jalonowski v. Jean (In re Jean)

  • Summarized by Bryan Robinson , Law Offices of Bryan Robinson
  • 11 years 6 months ago
Citation:
Jalonowski v. Jean (In re Jean), 9th Cir. B.A.P., BAP No. NC-14-1198-KuPaJu (November 21, 2014) [Unpublished]
Ruling:
In an unpublished opinion, the 9th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed the bankruptcy court’s orders confirming the debtors chapter 13 plan and denying the appellants dismissal motion and...
Judge(s):
KURTZ, PAPPAS and JURY, Bankruptcy Judges
Tag(s):

Haig v. Shart (In re Shart)

  • Summarized by Joel Newell , Ballard Spahr, LLP
  • 11 years 6 months ago
Citation:
9th Cir. BAP No. CC-14-1065-SpDTa (November 14, 2014)
Ruling:
Clear error is not demonstrated by pointing to conflicting evidence in the record. Since no partnership ever existed, Ms. Schardt is not vicariously liable for any of the partnership debts. ...
Judge(s):
SPRAKER, DUNN and TAYLOR
Tag(s):

Skavysh v. Katsman (In re Katsman)

  • Summarized by Madison Conquest , State of Tennessee Real Estate Asset Management
  • 11 years 6 months ago
Citation:
Skavysh v. Katsman (In re Katsman), No. 13-C-1881 (7th Cir. Sept. 23, 2014)
Ruling:
The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's holding, affirming that a Chapter 7 Debtor is not intitled to a discharge under Section 727(a)(4)(A), even in a "No-Asset" case, when she...
Judge(s):
Posner, Rovner and Williams, Circuit Judges.
Tag(s):

Williamson v. Murray (In re Murray)

  • Summarized by Bryan Robinson , Law Offices of Bryan Robinson
  • 11 years 6 months ago
Citation:
Williamson v. Murray (In re Murray), 10th Cir. Court Appeals, No. 14-3054 (BAP No. KS-13-034) (BAP) November 18, 2014
Ruling:
The 10 Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) for the Tenth Circuit and the bankruptcy court which rejected a Chapter 7 trustee’s challenge, to...
Judge(s):
KELLY, LUCERO, and HARTZ, Circuit Judges
Tag(s):

Choudhuri v. Deutsche Bank (In re Choudhuri)

  • Summarized by Joel Newell , Ballard Spahr, LLP
  • 11 years 6 months ago
Citation:
BAP No. NC-14-1140-PaJuKu (9th Cir. November 12, 2014)
Ruling:
The unpublished decisions of the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel the appeal of the bankruptcy court's order sustaining Deutsche Bank's objection to the Chapter 13 plan and denying...
Judge(s):
PAPPAS, JURY and KURTZ, Bankruptcy Judges
Tag(s):

Pages

About us in numbers

3967 in the system

3826 Summarized

0 Being Processed