Bankruptcy court had jurisdiction to disallow a claim that was based on the same claims that had been the subject of litigation outside of bankruptcy. Claims allowance is a core proceeding, and...
The trustee can overcome the burden of demonstrating that an appeal of a sale under § 363(b) is moot under § 363(m) if the appellant fails to offer a permissible theory for relief that would...
(1)Bankruptcy court had post-confirmation jurisdiction to adjudicate dispute over interpretation of contract assumed by debtor during bankruptcy-if Netflix had been permitted to stream films before...
Judge(s):
Reena Raggi and Raymond J. Lohler, Jr., Circuit Judges, and Joan M. Azrack, District Judge for E.D.N.Y. sitting by designation
Based on (I) the ordinary, dictionary meaning of the word, "received", (II) the context of section 503(b)(9) being an exemption to the general bankruptcy reclamation scheme established by section...
Judge(s):
HARDIMAN, KRAUSE, Circuit Judges, and STENGEL, District Judge from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
The bankruptcy court made erroneous factual findings and committed a legal error with respect to the threshold issue of whether there was a valid, binding, and enforceable settlement agreement...
Appellate standing in bankruptcy is limited to “persons aggrieved” by an order of the bankruptcy court. Appeals are limited to persons ‘whose rights or interests are directly and adversely...
In short, Appellants' claims do not fit into the narrow
category of matters that "have no existence outside of the
bankruptcy," In re Middlesex Power Equip. & Marine, Inc., 292 F.3d
at 68, or...
Judge(s):
Zobel (Trial), Howard, Souter and Lipez, USCA-1st Circuit
9th Cir. affirmed district court's (N.D. Cal.) dismissal of consolidated actions brought under Railway Labor Act, alleging union breached duty of fair representation in offering disparate...