In re D. Erik von Kiel, No. 13-1925 (3d Cir. December 24, 2013)
Ruling:
Dr. von Kiel concealed property belonging to and/or controlled by him within one year before the date of his chapter 7 petition and discharge of his debts was denied.
Judge(s):
RENDELL, GREENAWAY, JR., and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges
Blade Energy Pty, LTD v. Jacqueline Rodriguez, CC-13-1256-DKiTa (9th Cir. B.A.P. 2013)
Ruling:
Bankruptcy court affirmed. Adversary proceeding dismissed with prejudice for counsel's failure to prosecute and comply with local rules regarding meet and confer and filing a joint status report.
Judge(s):
Scott C. Clarkson, presiding; before judges Dunn, Kirscher, and Taylor.
Summarized by Mark Melickian , Raines Feldman Littrell LLP
12 years 3 months ago
Citation:
13-1026
Ruling:
The circuit court affirmed the district court's ruling, but not without comment. The appeal was on several grounds, but this summary focuses on the primary 523(a)(6) analysis, which includes...
In the unpublished decisions, the Ninth Circuit BAP agreed with the Bankruptcy Court. The BAP ruled that Debtor's subjective motive for transferring Alliance's assets meets Section 523(a)(6)...
Judge(s):
Honorable Kurtz, Ballinger (sitting by designation), and Pappas
The Ninth Circuit BAP reversed the Bankruptcy Court’s ruling in the Western District of Washington. The BAP held that the Bankruptcy Court erred as a matter of law in determined that Washington...
In the unpublished decision, the BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion for leave to file a late proof of claim (POC) and a complaint for 11 U.S.C. § 523...
Simon v. FIA Card Services, N.A., No. 12-3293, 2013 WL 5508868 (3d Cir. Oct. 7, 2013)
Ruling:
Affirming in part and reversing in part the dismissal of the Debtors’ claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (the “FDCPA”) and remanding the case back to the United States...
Judge(s):
The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation
The 9th Cir. BAP agreed with the Bankruptcy Court and held that an in rem order entered in a prior bankruptcy case was effective as to the real property previously owned by the Debtor / Appellant,...
