Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. Schupbach, et al. (In re Schupbach), Case No. 13-068 (10th Cir. May 19, 2015). Unpublished.
Ruling:
Creditor’s appeal of dismissal of non-dischargeability claims are rendered constitutionally moot when reorganization plan treats creditor’s claim as satisfied in full and creditor does not object.
Rael v. Wells Fargo Bank (In re Rael), BAP No. WY-14-035 (10th Cir. BAP February 27, 2015)
Ruling:
Creditor did not violate the stay or the terms of the individual debtors' confirmed chapter 11 plan when it sought to enforce its preserved lien rights in state court rather than returning to the...
The Eleventh Circuit held that the filing of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition by a Florida debtor who owns, or debtors who own, homestead property does not foreclose the availability of Florida's...
Summarized by Steven Holmes , Cavazos Hendricks Poirot, PC
11 years 1 week ago
Citation:
Case No. 14-10768 (5th Cir. April 23, 2015)
Ruling:
Appellant was not entitled to maintain its Section 1111(b) election because the confirmed plan provided for a sale of the appellant's collateral and appellant failed to provide notice of its intent...
The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court's order affirming confirmation of the debtor's chapter 13 plan, holding that as a general matter an above-median debtor may categorically exclude...
Bankruptcy court order determining that characterization of transaction in confirmed plan was binding on taxing authority was reversed. Upon de novo review, bankruptcy court order determining that...
O&S Trucking, Inc. v. Mercedes Benz Financial Services USA (In re O&S Trucking, Inc.), 2015 WL 1528302 (8th Cir. BAP April 7, 2015)
Ruling:
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel dismissed debtor's appeal from order confirming its third amended plan on grounds that the debtor did not have standing and the debtor's arguments were moot.
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit, Nos. RI 14-049, 14-051, March 31, 2015
Ruling:
Reversing and remanding, the First Circuit BAP concluded that the binding effect of a confirmed chapter 13 plan prevails over a claim that is disallowed under the claims allowance process set forth...
Affirmed. Equity holder being paid in full for interest in debtor under plan cannot block plan by insisting on being equity holder in reorganized debtor. Going concern method was appropriate...
Judge(s):
MARTIN, ANDERSON, and COTE (District Judge (S.D.N.Y) sitting by designation)
The Court of Appeals lacks jurisdiction over appeals from non-final orders of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. In particular, an order denying confirmation of a chapter 11 plan of reorganization is...
