NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION BOARD v JURCEVIC

Citation:
14-4297/15-3324/17-3162 (6th Circuit, Aug 11,2017) Published
Case Status:
Affirmed in part and Reversed in part
Ruling:
District Court correctly enjoined defendants, accused of fraudulently obtaining loans from Credit Union, from disposing of assets other than as necessary for living expenses. District Court erred...
Judge(s):
Sutton, McKeague, Thapar
Tag(s):

In re: EMERALD CASINO, INC.

Citation:
16-075, 16-1132, 16-1133, 16-1143, 16-1148, 16-1160, 16-1161, 16-4464, 16-1165, 16-1235 (7th Circuit, Aug 11,2017) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed in part and Reversed in part
Ruling:
Where officers and directors of a casino caused the casino’s gaming licensed to be revoked, they may be held jointly and severally liable for breach of the company’s shareholder agreement,...
Judge(s):
Kanne, Sykes, Hamilton
Tag(s):

1EE LLC v. Giddens (In re Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.)

Citation:
16-2737; 16-2788 (2nd Circuit, Jul 27,2017) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed in part and Reversed in part
Ruling:
SUMMARY ORDER -- NO PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. Two former employees of Lehman were not entitled to separate claims against Lehman for bonus claims tied to their employment that were assumed and paid by...
Judge(s):
Dennis Jacobs, Debra Ann Livingston, Circuit Judges; George B. Daniels, District Judge
Tag(s):

Avant Capital Partners, LLC v. Strathmore Development Co Michigan, LLC

Citation:
Sixth Circuit Case Nos. 16-2378/16-2418; File Name: 17a0400n.06 (6th Circuit, Jul 10,2017) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed in part and Reversed in part
Ruling:
Sixth Circuit reversed District Court's addition of a related non-party to a judgment on account of alleged transfers to the non-party by a judgment debtor and determined that, under Michigan...
Judge(s):
Boggs, Clay and Sutton, Circuit Judges
Tag(s):

Combs v. The Cordish Companies, Inc.

Citation:
15-3265 (8th Circuit, Jul 05,2017) Published
Case Status:
Affirmed in part and Reversed in part
Ruling:
Claims based on events that occur after the filing of a voluntary Chapter 7 petition are not subject to judicial estoppel if the debtor fails to disclose and schedule such claims. The Court of...
Judge(s):
RILEY, WOLLMAN, KELLY
Tag(s):

Edmondson v. Gordon (In re Gordon)

Citation:
12-09605 (6th Circuit, May 18,2017) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed in part and Reversed in part
Ruling:
The Sixth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed the Bankruptcy Court's contempt finding and remanded for determination of amount of sanctions to be awarded. The Panel affirmed the Bankruptcy...
Judge(s):
DELK, HUMPHREY, and OPPERMAN
Tag(s):

In re Wright

Citation:
16-8019, 2017 WL 1371293 (6th Circuit, Apr 17,2017) Published
Case Status:
Affirmed in part and Reversed in part
Ruling:
Property listed in schedules and not administered before case is closed is abandoned to the debtor and is not subject to later administration. Property that is not listed in schedules is not...
Judge(s):
Harrison, Preston and Wise
Tag(s):

Armendariz v. Chowaiki

Citation:
16-50905 (5th Circuit, Mar 30,2017) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed in part and Reversed in part
Ruling:
"With no opinion on how this [Rule 11 sanctions] issue should come out on remand, we reverse and remand this issue to the district court for a 'brief statement of reasons' justifying its denial of...
Judge(s):
Stewart, Jolly, Jones (per curiam)
Tag(s):

Encanto Restaurants, Inc. v. Vidal, et al

Citation:
Bankruptcy Case Nos. 12-08567-MCF & 12-08570-MCF (Consolidated) , Adv. Pro. No. 14-00030-MCF, BAP No. PR 16-034 (1st Circuit, Mar 21,2017) Published
Case Status:
Affirmed in part and Reversed in part
Ruling:
Encanto lacks standing to pursue an appeal from the June 2016 Order and the Judgment to the extent that those rulings denied Encanto’s requests for relief for alleged violations of § 362’s...
Judge(s):
Bankruptcy Judge Mildred Caban Flores, BAP Judges: Bailey, Harwood and Fagone
Tag(s):

In re John Doe

Citation:
16-1681 (3rd Circuit, Mar 09,2017) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed in part and Reversed in part
Ruling:
The court affirmed district court's denial of appellant's request for relief under Rule 59(e), but vacated and remanded to district court to determine whether appellant's Rule 60(b) request was...
Judge(s):
Fisher, Vanaskie, and Krause
Tag(s):

Pages

About us in numbers

3743 in the system

3626 Summarized

0 Being Processed