Home » Business

Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Old Cold LLC

  • Summarized by David Baker , Law Office of David G. Baker
  • 8 years 2 months ago
Citation:
16-90102, 116-9015 (1st Circuit, Jan 12,2018) Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
Bankruptcy court's finding of good faith in a §363 sale affirmed; otherwise the appeal is moot due to the sale having been completed without a stay.
Judge(s):
Kayatta (author), Torruella, and Lynch
Tag(s):

Mission product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC

  • Summarized by David Baker , Law Office of David G. Baker
  • 8 years 2 months ago
Citation:
16-9106 (1st Circuit, Jan 12,2018) Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
Bankruptcy court affirmed. BAP had affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Judge(s):
Kayatta (author) and Lynch, with Torruella concurring in part and dissenting in part.
Tag(s):

Philadelphia Entertainment & Development Partners, LP v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Revenue

  • Summarized by Nascine Howell , Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • 8 years 2 months ago
Citation:
No. 17-1954 (3rd Circuit, Jan 11,2018) Published
Case Status:
Reversed and Remanded
Ruling:
In this precedential opinion, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case back to the district court for further proceedings. The Third Circuit found, among other things, that...
Judge(s):
Chagares, Restrepo, and Greenberg, Circuit Judges
Tag(s):

Wright v. Kite Bros., L.L.C.

  • Summarized by J. Newman , Newman & Newman
  • 8 years 2 months ago
Citation:
No. 17-30450 (5th Circuit, Jan 12,2018) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED and Appellees’ Motion for Sanctions is GRANTED IN PART.
Judge(s):
REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges
Tag(s):

U.S. Energy Development Corp. v. CL III Funding Holding Co., L.L.C. In the Matter of WBH Energy, L.P.)

  • Summarized by Craig Geno , Law Offices of Craig M Geno, PLLC
  • 8 years 2 months ago
Citation:
17-50217 (5th Circuit, Jan 10,2018) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
Lower Court's affirmed. Appellant is not entitled to attorneys' fees because it was not a "prevailing party" as required under the applicable documents.
Judge(s):
Higginbotham, Jones and Graves
Tag(s):

Dering Pierson Group, LLC v. Kantos

  • Summarized by Lars Fuller , BakerHostetler
  • 8 years 2 months ago
Citation:
No. 17-6014 (8th Circuit, Jan 09,2018) Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
BAP for 8th Cir. affirmed ruling of bankruptcy court (D. Minn - St. Paul) entering judgment on 523(a)(6) claim in favor of debtor. BAP found no error in bankruptcy court ruling that creditor failed...
Judge(s):
Nail, Schermer, Dow
Tag(s):

Crystallex International Corp. v. Petroleos De Venezuela, S.A.

  • Summarized by Elie Worenklein , Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
  • 8 years 2 months ago
Citation:
Nos. 16-4012 & 17-1439, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (3rd Circuit, Jan 03,2018) Published
Case Status:
Reversed
Ruling:
A transfer by a non-debtor entity cannot be a “fraudulent transfer” under the Delaware Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“DUFTA”).
Judge(s):
Vanaskie, Rendell and Fuentess
Tag(s):

IN RE: HALER

  • Summarized by Aaron Kaufman , Gray Reed LLP
  • 8 years 3 months ago
Citation:
17-40229 (5th Circuit, Dec 29,2017) Not Published
Case Status:
Reversed
Ruling:
Debtor's oral statement that his company was in "very fine legally [sic] financial shape" and had "plenty of cash to operate" fell within the exception under section 523(a)(2)(A) because it was an...
Judge(s):
King, Dennis and Costa (per curiam)
Tag(s):

Pages

About us in numbers

3943 in the system

3819 Summarized

0 Being Processed