9th Cir. affirmed district court's (N.D. Cal.) dismissal of consolidated actions brought under Railway Labor Act, alleging union breached duty of fair representation in offering disparate...
Auberto Nieves Guzmán and Annette Nazario Rodríguez Debtors appeal from the order denying their motion for reconsideration of the order sustaining the chap objection to certain claimed...
Judge(s):
BAP: Feeney, Finkle and Fagone. USBC-Puerto Rico: Tester
The 11th Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling that the fraudulent transfer claims in a bankruptcy complaint fell within the prior acts exclusion in the insurance policy.
Held that Parent...
Summarized by Eduardo Glas , Law Office of Eduardo Glas PC
8 years 11 months ago
Citation:
The opinion is not worth of being summarized. It is simply vacating the prior court decision in light of the Supreme Court's decision reversing the Third Cicuit. (3rd Circuit, May 08,2017) Not Published
Fifth Circuit affirmed ruling of district court (E.D. La.), which affirmed bankruptcy court judgment in favor of creditor on 523(a)(2)(A) claim. Debtor attorney obtained extension of credit from...
Claims filed by Lehman employees on account of restricted stock units, giving them a contingent right to own Lehman stock after a five-year holding period, were properly subordinated to the claims...
Assignment of Rents conveys ownership of rents to assignee upon default. Debtor has no interest in rents after default, and rents are not property of Debtor's estate in subsequent Chapter 11...
Judge(s):
Clay, Gibbons and Stranch (on brief for the Court)
The United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania erred when it held that a "named insured," as used in 40 Pa. State. § 638, only includes that who own a structure and are...
Concluding that the mere interpretation of a confirmed plan by a bankruptcy constitute did not constitute either a modification of the confirmed chapter 11 plan or the application of the Bankruptcy...
Without pleaded facts adequate to support a reasonable inference of material falsity, the plaintiff's section 523(a)(2)(B) claim does not cross the line from possible to plausible. The plausibility...
