Bates v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

Case Type:
Consumer
Case Status:
Affirmed
Citation:
16-1228 (1st Circuit, Dec 14,2016) Published
Tag(s):
Ruling:

The First Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy court's decision that a 1099-A form sent by the mortgagee did not violate the discharge injunction.

Procedural context:

The Bateses appealed from a bankruptcy court ruling granting summary judgment to Citimortgage.  The district court affirmed, as did the First Circuit.

Facts:

Citimortgage sent the Bateses a 1099-A form after foreclosing the mortgage.  The form had incorrect information on it.  This was disturbing and distressing to the Bateses because the form implied that they were still liable for the mortgage even though they received a chapter 7 discharge, and when they called Citimortgage to inquire, Citimortgage told them the same thing.  They reopened their bankruptcy case and filed an Adversary Proceeding.  The bankruptcy court granted Citimortgage summary judgment, and the district court and First Circuit affirmed.  There was a related issue concerning a recorded telephone call from Citimortgage demanding that they pay for insurance on the foreclosed property, but that issue was not before the First Circuit since the Bateses prevailed onthat as a discharge violation, but were awarded no damages.

Judge(s):
Lynch, Thompson (author) and Barron

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign In using your ABI Member credentials. Not a Member yet? Join ABI now - it is absolutely worth it!

About us in numbers

3923 in the system

3801 Summarized

0 Being Processed