- Case Type:
- Case Status:
- Reversed and Remanded
- No. 14-16854 (9th Circuit, Mar 31,2017) Published
- 9th Circuit reversed ruling of district court (D. Ariz.), after district court reversed bankruptcy court's summary judgment in favor of judgment lien creditor, who brought adversary against chapter 7 trustee, seeking declaration that lien creditor had priority in sale proceeds. Panel applied California law to Arizona debtor to conclude that creditor's lien attached to debtor's co-tenancy, notwithstanding co-ownership with non-debtor wife. In rem nature of dispute, plus debtor's consent, compelled application of California law to California real property in choice-of-law analysis.
- Procedural context:
- Judgment lien creditor sued chapter 7 trustee in declaratory relief adversary, asserting priority in sale proceeds. Bankruptcy court granted summary judgment in favor of creditor; trustee appealed to district court. District court reversed. Creditor appealed to 9th Circuit.
- Arizona debtor signed a guaranty; his wife did not. Debtor defaulted; creditor obtained judgment against debtor in Arizona, and sought to enforce judgment lien against debtor's property in California. San Francisco co-op apartment owned by both husband and wife was tenancy-in-common, not community property under California law. Under California law, interest of co-tenant was subject to judgment lien. Under Arizona law, co-op would be treated as community property, and creditor's judgment lien would not attach to debtor's interest in community property.
- Tashima, Smith, Korman
3045 in the system
0 Being Processed