Now Updating
In re: DIANN MARIE CATES

Summarizing by Lars Fuller

Freddie Brown v. Mary Viegelahn

Case Type:
Consumer
Case Status:
Reversed and Remanded
Citation:
19-50177 (5th Circuit, Jun 08,2020) Published
Tag(s):
Ruling:
In a Chapter 13 plan context, a trustee's objection/argument/requirement at confirmation hearing that would prohibit certain modifications to the plan (such as the so called Molina language,from Molina v. Langehennig, 2015 WL 8494012 at*1(W.D. Tex. 2015) violates Section 1329. The bankruptcy court "should not limit Section 1329's availability based on speculation about an as-of-yet non-existent request to modify a Chapter 13 plan."
Procedural context:
T he debtor appealed the bankruptcy court's ruling to the district court. The district court sua sponte certified the appeal to the Fifth Circuit-which accepted it.
Facts:
At the Chapter 13 confirmation hearing, the bankruptcy court would only confirm the plan if the debtor chose one of two non-statutory conditions that the court would then impose. The debtor did not like either option, but rather than having his case dismissed, he accepted one of the conditions and then appealed.
Judge(s):
Southwick, Graves and Englehardt

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign In using your ABI Member credentials. Not a Member yet? Join ABI now - it is absolutely worth it!

About us in numbers

3320 in the system

3193 Summarized

9 Being Processed