- Fifth Circuit;No. 15-50455
- The doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel were not applicable to a party which advocated very different valuations for the same property in different contexts (value for confirmation purposes was several million dollars less than the value of the same property the same party asserted in a separate adversary proceeding). in addition, the bankruptcy court's denial of a motion to change venue was affirmed.
- Procedural context:
- Appeal from the District Court for the Western District of Texas
- The Debtor asserted that certain property had a value of $8,000,000 to $10,050,000 at plan confirmation and argued that the same property had a value of $2,100,000 to $2,600,000 in a separate adversary proceeding.
- KIng, Clement and Owen
St. Louis Fed: Unemployment Could Top 32 Percent as 47 Million Workers Are Laid Off Amid Coronavirus
3062 in the system
2 Being Processed