Hundal v. Bronitsky (In re Hundal)

Summarized by Laura Coordes , Arizona State University, Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law
9 years 6 months ago

Citation:

Hundal v. Bronitsky (In re Hundal), No. NC-15-1257-JuKiTa (9th Cir. BAP Aug. 16, 2015) (unpublished)

Tag(s):

Ruling:

Bankruptcy court order dismissing debtor's chapter 13 case after debtor failed to comply with court-imposed filing deadline affirmed.

Procedural context:

Appeal from the bankruptcy court for the Northern District of California dismissing chapter 13 case, reviewed for abuse of discretion.

Facts:

Pro se chapter 13 debtor failed to disclose certain other related chapter 13 cases that were either pending or had been dismissed. Bankruptcy court issued an order requiring debtor to file missing schedules and other documents and denied debtor's request for an extension of time to comply after objecting creditor brought related cases to court's attention. Although debtor filed some of the missing information, she was late in complying with the court's request, and the bankruptcy court dismissed the case.

Judge(s):

Jury, Kirscher, Taylor

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign In using your ABI Member credentials. Not a Member yet? Join ABI now - it is absolutely worth it!