Now Updating
In re: DAVID C. GOAD

Summarizing by Amir Shachmurove

J&R Investment v. Anthony (In re Anthony)

Citation:
J&R Investment v. Anthony (In re Anthony), Case No. 15-4161 (10th Cir. Aug. 29, 2016)
Tag(s):
Ruling:
Bankruptcy court did not err in its determination that (1) plaintiff did not meet is prima facie case for revocation of discharge, (2) that the burden of persuasion did not shift to the defendant upon presentation of a prima facie case, or (3) in factual findings relating to the "reckless indifference to the truth."
Procedural context:
On appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Utah affirming the judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah.
Facts:
Pro se debtor filed a voluntary chapter 7 petition and received a general discharge. Judgment creditor of the debtor filed a complaint seeking revocation of the discharged based upon inconsistencies between the debtor's tax returns and his pro se petition. Specifically the inconsistencies had to do with ownership of a defunct company and two pre-petition check payments to the debtor.
Judge(s):
Hartz, Murphy, and Phillips

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign In using your ABI Member credentials. Not a Member yet? Join ABI now - it is absolutely worth it!

About us in numbers

3414 in the system

3292 Summarized

2 Being Processed