Annual Spring Meeting | April 11-14 | Washington, D.C. Register Today View Schedule

Now Updating
United Bank v. Buckingham

Summarizing by Shane Ramsey

Roach v. Marshack (In re Roach)

Case Type:
Consumer
Case Status:
Affirmed
Citation:
No. CC-18-1144-KuTaF, 2019 WL 408628 (9th Circuit, Jan 29,2019) Not Published
Tag(s):
Ruling:
BAP for 9th Circuit affirmed ruling of bankruptcy court (C.D. Cal.) granting chapter 7 trustee's sale motion over debtor's objection. Debtor waived appeal of disbursement of sale proceeds after failing to appeal bankruptcy court's order authorizing disbursement. BAP could not revisit appropriateness of distribution of proceeds without payment of debtor's homestead exemption. Regardless, debtor was not entitled to claim homestead exemption in the sale proceeds. Debtor could not claim homestead exemption in consensual secured creditor's assignment of half interest in lien to estate.
Procedural context:
Trustee moved to sell real estate over debtor's objection. Bankruptcy court approved compromise between trustee and Omaha Bank. Debtor appealed to BAP for 9th Circuit.
Facts:
Debtor was president of corporation ("Sesa"). Sesa borrowed $937K from Omaha Bank. Debtor guaranteed Sesa's obligation. Debtor's guaranty was secured by deed of trust against her homestead. Sesa defaulted. Debtor filed a chapter 7 petition. Trustee moved to sell homestead property and distribute proceeds to secured parties. As part of transaction, Omaha Bank assigned a half-interest in its lien to the bankruptcy estate. Trustee moved for approval of the sale, including approval of distribution of proceeds, with estate receiving $160,000. Debtor claimed homestead exemption in the proceeds.
Judge(s):
Kurtz, Taylor, Faris

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign In using your ABI Member credentials. Not a Member yet? Join ABI now - it is absolutely worth it!

About us in numbers

2857 in the system

2781 Summarized

13 Being Processed