Now Updating
Felipe Gomez v Larry Weisenthal

Summarizing by Paris Gyparakis

SANGHA V. SCHRADER

Case Type:
Consumer
Case Status:
Affirmed
Citation:
24-4548 (9th Circuit, Apr 15,2025) Not Published
Tag(s):
Ruling:
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court and Bankruptcy Court application of issue preclusion on the "maliciousness" prong under 11 USC 523(a)(6).
Procedural context:
The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel and Ninth Circuit had previously vacated the bankruptcy court's decision to apply issue preclusion to the "willfulness" prong of 523(a)(6). The bankruptcy court then considered "willfulness" de novo, permitting discovery and conducting a trial on that issue, but it applied issue preclusion to the "maliciousness" prong.
Facts:
The creditor had obtained a $1.3 million state court default judgment against the debtor prior for defamation per se where the state court had awarded punitive damages. The bankruptcy court applied the California standard for issue preclusion to find malicious intent by the debtor based on the state court judgment. The Ninth Circuit held that the bankruptcy court properly applied California's issue preclusion to "maliciousness" and properly considered the "willfulness" and "maliciousness" prongs separately.
Judge(s):
Bade, Sung, and Kane

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign In using your ABI Member credentials. Not a Member yet? Join ABI now - it is absolutely worth it!

About us in numbers

3923 in the system

3801 Summarized

1 Being Processed