Stanley Kappell Watson v. Shenekka Bradsher, et al
- Summarized by Jonathan Batiste , Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
- 6 months 3 weeks ago
- Case Type:
- Consumer
- Case Status:
- Affirmed
- Citation:
- No. 24-11389 (11th Circuit, Aug 04,2025) Published
- Tag(s):
-
- Ruling:
- The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit affirmed the district court’s affirmation of the bankruptcy court’s decision finding debts from judgments for false imprisonment, due to willful and malicious injury, to be nondischargeable. 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) allow bankruptcy courts to deem debts nondischargeable when they relate to willful, malicious injury. Courts can infer malice from evidence establishing that debtors committed wrongful, excessive acts. The bankruptcy court did not err by making such an inference based on the available records and the testimony heard at trial.
- Procedural context:
- Creditors sued Debtor in state court for various claims. Debtor filed for bankruptcy after the state court jury returned an adverse verdict. Creditors filed an adversary complaint in the bankruptcy court, and the court held a trial. The court decided against Debtor’s interests, and Debtor appealed the bankruptcy court’s decision to the district court, which remanded the matter to the bankruptcy court. Debtor appealed the bankruptcy court’s decision on remand, and the district court affirmed the bankruptcy court’s decision. Debtor then appealed the district court’s decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.
- Facts:
- Debtor, a former county official, met Creditors at a bar in 2012. An altercation erupted after Creditors rejected his advances. Debtor grew angry and accused Creditors of stealing his wallet after he couldn’t find it when trying to pay his bill. Debtor demanded Creditors’ arrests, threatening police officers’ employment, and threatening to have the bar shut down if his demands were not met. The officers searched Creditors’ purses, and they did not contain Debtor’s wallet. An arrest still ensued. Debtor was then taken home, and he found his wallet in his car the next day. Creditors sued Debtor in state court and received a $150,500 judgment. Debtor filed for bankruptcy after the state trial. Creditors filed an adversary complaint in the bankruptcy court to make the judgment debt nondischargeable. The court found the false imprisonment debt and the slander debt to be nondischargeable after a trial. Debtor appealed for the first time, seeking to have the slander and false imprisonment debt converted into dischargeable debts. The district court reversed and remanded the bankruptcy court’s decision on whether the slander injury was willful. The court maintained that Creditors’ claims for false imprisonment were nondischargeable. The bankruptcy court found the slander injury to not be willful on remand, making it a dischargeable debt. Debtor then appealed again, this time to contest the allocation of judgment debt to the nondischargeable false imprisonment claims. The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court’s decision, and Debtor appealed again to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. The false imprisonment met the standard set by 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) as Debtor willfully caused injury via the confinement of Creditors that he demanded. The bankruptcy court did not err in making the factual finding that Debtor maliciously caused Debtors’ false imprisonment. Bankruptcy courts can infer malice from evidence establishing that Debtor committed wrongful, excessive acts. Debtor met that threshold by intimidating Creditors, demanding Creditors’ arrests despite proof of their innocence, and by abusing his position as a public official when threatening the officers’ employment. The dischargeability of the slander claims and nondischargeability of the false imprisonment claims are permissible because nondischargeability depends on whether Debtor intended the specific injury. The absence of intent for the slander injuries did not preclude a finding of intent for the false imprisonment injuries. The bankruptcy court did not err by finding that Debtor willfully and maliciously caused the false imprisonment injuries. The bankruptcy court’s time presiding over a trial with live testimony supported its decision in allocating judgment debts. The court did not err as it considered both the testimony of various witnesses and the trial records available.
- Judge(s):
- Pryor, Luck, and Brasher
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign In using your ABI Member credentials. Not a Member yet? Join ABI now - it is absolutely worth it!
