Traci K. Stevenson v. James V. Uttermohlen (In re Uttermohlen)
- Summarized by Ryan Heilman , Heilman Law PLLC
- 10 years 9 months ago
- Citation:
- Stevenson v. Uttermohlen (In re Uttermohlen), Case No. 13-10289 (11th Cir. Aug. 9, 2013) (unpublished) (per curiam).
- Tag(s):
-
- Ruling:
- The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the judgment of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, and ruled that the debtor's right to a tax refund is exempt as tenancy-by-the-entireties property under 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(3)(B) and Florida law, even where the refunded tax contributions relate solely to the debtor's income, and the non-filing spouse does not work.
- Procedural context:
- The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida (Catherine Peek McEwen, Bankruptcy Judge) sustained an exemption of tax refunds over the Chapter 7 trustee's objection.
On appeal, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Virginia M. Hernandez Covington, District Judge) affirmed the Bankruptcy Court's ruling. The Chapter 7 trustee then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
- Facts:
- Debtor sought to exempt a $10,668.00 tax refund as tenancy-by-the-entireties property. The Chapter 7 trustee objected, arguing that (i) the refunded tax contributions related solely to debtor's income, business income, and losses, (ii) the non-filing spouse did not work outside the home, and (iii) the tax refund does not qualify as tenancy-by-the-entireties property, but should be apportioned on the basis of each spouse's income.
The Bankruptcy Court found that all unities required to to own property as tenants-by-the-entireties existed on the date the debtor filed bankruptcy, and overruled the Chapter 7 trustee's objection.
- Judge(s):
- Barkett, Marcus, Hill
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign In using your ABI Member credentials. Not a Member yet? Join ABI now - it is absolutely worth it!
