Now Updating
GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, V RHEA ANN BROWN; GREGORY KEVIN MAZE

Summarizing by Timothy Anzenberger

CURTIS V. AMMEC INVESTMENTS, II, ET AL.

Summarizing by Paris Gyparakis

U.S. Bank National Association v. Lewis and Clark Apartments, LP (In re Lewis and Clark Apartments, LP)

Citation:
In re Lewis and Clark Apartments, LP, ---F.3d --- (8th Cir. BAP October 11, 2012) (Federman, J.)
Tag(s):
Ruling:
REVERSING and REMANDING, the 8th Cir. BAP held that a challenge to a valuation decision based on law and not fact is an appealable interlocutory order because the legal bases for valuation affect plan confirmation; also, the 8th Cir. BAP held that any valuation of real property must consider the impact of tax credits on the amount that a third party would pay for the property in an arm's length transaction, at least when the tax credits run with the land.
Procedural context:
Appeal from the bankruptcy court's decision to exclude tax credits from a determination of value and that a secured claim was worth $3,500,000.00.
Facts:
The debtor's apartment complex was a Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) property and all parties conceded that the tax credits would transfer to a subsequent owner whether the ownership transfered by sale or foreclosure. US Bank had a total claim of $6,297,215.39. The bankruptcy court determined that the property was worth $3,500,000.00 not considering the value of tax credits.
Judge(s):
Kressel, Federman, and Nail (BAP Judges)

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign In using your ABI Member credentials. Not a Member yet? Join ABI now - it is absolutely worth it!

About us in numbers

3936 in the system

3812 Summarized

2 Being Processed