Now Updating
Felipe Gomez v Larry Weisenthal

Summarizing by Paris Gyparakis

Warren v. Young (In re Warren)

Citation:
marked not for publication
Tag(s):
Ruling:
In an unpublished opinion, the 9th Circuit B.A.P. affirmed the Bankruptcy Court's order dismissing for cause a reopened Chapter 11 case after the debtors failed to pay several creditors despite paying other creditors during the 4 plus years following plan confirmation. Bankruptcy Court found that cause to dismiss existed and dismissal was in best interest of creditors in part because it concluded that debtors did not intend to comply with the terms of their plan and BAP affirmed.
Procedural context:
Chapter 11 case reopened on the motion of a creditor (not a party to the appeal) asserting that it had not received payments under the confirmed plan despite holding an allowed claim. After case reopened, Appellees filed a motion to convert based on the same allegation of non-payment of allowed claim.
Facts:
Following confirmation of plan, debtors paid $1,000 per month for 52 months, on a pro rata basis, to some but not all creditors with allowed claims. The unpaidcreditors numbered sixteen.
Judge(s):
Pappas, Jury, Kurtz

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign In using your ABI Member credentials. Not a Member yet? Join ABI now - it is absolutely worth it!

About us in numbers

3923 in the system

3801 Summarized

1 Being Processed