Clear Sky Properties, LLC v. Roussel (In re Roussel)

Summarized by Lars Fuller , BakerHostetler
11 years 5 months ago

Citation:

Clear Sky Properties, LLC v. Roussel (In re Roussel), No. 14-1150 (8th Cir. October 3, 2014)

Tag(s):

Ruling:

Eighth Circuit dismissed debtor's appeal for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 158. Eighth Circuit ruled that district court decision, reversing bankruptcy court and remanding for determination of the dischargeability of state court attorney fee award, was not a final judgment subject to further appeal. District court's remand for determination of dischargeability of attorney fees was more than "ministerial act," and thus, district court decision was non-final for appellate purposes. The Eighth Circuit noted that US Supreme Court precedent supported conclusion in that USCOTUS rulings that undetermined fee awards should not preclude appellate review were applied to fee awards in pending case, not, as here, where fee award at issue occurred in separate state court case.

Procedural context:

Debtor appealed to Eighth Circuit after district court (USDCT, ED. Ark.) reversed bankruptcy court judgment finding that debt was dischargeable, and remanding case back to bankruptcy court to determine dischargeability of state court attorney fee award.

Facts:

Debtor filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 after state court jury entered judgment against him on breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty claims, awarding compensatory, punitive damages, and attorney fees. Bankruptcy court rejected creditors' arguments that collateral estoppel precluded relitigation of breach of fiduciary duty claim and heard testimony on debtor's state of mind. Bankruptcy court entered judgment declaring that nearly all damages were dischargeable, including attorney fees. Creditors appealed to district court and district court reversed, applying collateral estoppel to hold that because state jury awarded punitive damages, it necessarily found the debtor committed defalcation while acting as a fiduciary under 11 USC 523(a)(4), and that he acted willfully and maliciously under 523(a)(6). It found nondischargeable all the debt related to debtor's breach of fiduciary duty and remanded the issue of the dischargeability of the attorney fees back to bankruptcy court for further consideration.

Judge(s):

Benton, Beam, Shepherd

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign In using your ABI Member credentials. Not a Member yet? Join ABI now - it is absolutely worth it!