Interlachen Harriet Investments Ltd. v. Kelley (In re Petters Company, Inc.)
- Citation:
- No. 11-6013 (8th Cir BAP, August 19, 2001 )
- Tag(s):
-
- Ruling:
- A bankruptcy court's approval of a settlement will be upheld unless no reasonable person could agree with the decision to approve the settlement. Deference is given to the court that has overseen a matter over a long period of time and is familiar with the issues and nuance. Additional deference is given to the judgment of experienced trial judges. The approval of a settlement does not require a substantial record.
- Procedural context:
- A global settlement involving numerous estates and courts was objected to be a single creditor. The BAP upheld the approval of the settlement.
- Facts:
- A massive Ponzi scheme lead to numerous bankruptcy cases being filed in various courts. The case involved a chapter 11 (for a number of entities that began as District Court receiverships), a chapter 7 trustee, two debtors in possession, and active creditors committee, and six adversary proceedings. A global settlement involving transfers between estates and creditors was filed and a single creditor objected to the approval of the settlement on the basis that the record was inadequate and that the fact in the record were insufficient to support the approval of the settlement. In addition to the bankruptcy court approving the settlement, the settlement was contingent upon the approval of another bankruptcy court, the receivership court, the confirmation of a joint chapter 11 plan, and approval of a Court in Bermuda, all of which contingencies had been met. While the settlement had been substantially consummated, the court found that in any event overturning the settlement agreement would have been unwarranted on the grounds stated.
- Judge(s):
- Schermer, Venters, and Nail, opinion by Venters.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign In using your ABI Member credentials. Not a Member yet? Join ABI now - it is absolutely worth it!
