- Citation:
- No. 10-1400 (U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit).
- Tag(s):
-
- Ruling:
- Vacate district court's judgment and remand for dismissal.
- Procedural context:
- On appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Detroit ). Case No. 09-13505
- Facts:
- In 2008, several bankruptcy judges in the Eastern District of Michigan decided to resolve a potential impediment to the resolution of Chapter 13 bankruptcy plans--the manner by which the federal government pays tax refunds to debtors. The judges found that many Chapter 13 debtors were receiving tax refund checks and spending the money instead of using the funds to pay their Chapter 13 plan. Accordingly, the bankruptcy judges began entering orders in Chapter 13 plans that required the IRS to send individual tax refunds to the Chapter 13 trustees, not to the individuals as the Internal Revenue Code contemplates. Over time, the IRS found this process to be time consuming and unmanageable. As a result, the federal government sued the various Chapter 13 trustees in the Eastern District of Michigan for violation of the United States' sovereign immunity. The District Court ruled in favor of the United States. On appeal, the Sixth Circuit disagreed on the basis that the United States lacked standing. It reasoned that the Bankruptcy Court was the necessary party to the lawsuit, not the various Trustees, as the Bankruptcy Court was the party issuing the order that the United States was challenging. Accordingly, the Sixth Circuit vacated the district court's ruling and remanded for a dismissal due to lack of jurisdiction.
- Judge(s):
- Norris, Sutton and Griffin
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign In using your ABI Member credentials. Not a Member yet? Join ABI now - it is absolutely worth it!
