Try Volo

Volo provides ABI Members with the most timely bankruptcy decisions from the U.S. Courts of Appeal and the Bankruptcy Appellate Courts. Volunteer members provide a summary of each new opinion within 24 hours of their release, and each summary includes the full text of the opinion, the case status, a citation, and the judges involved. Users can also subscribe to email alerts from the circuits that interest them most.

Try ABI Free for 30 days!

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign In using your ABI Member credentials. Not a Member yet? Join ABI now - it is absolutely worth it!

Barker v. Eiler (In re Principia Equitas)

  • Summarized by Lars Fuller , BakerHostetler
  • 7 years 1 week ago
Citation:
BAP No. OR-18-1128-SKuF (9th Circuit, Mar 28,2019) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
BAP for 9th Circuit affirmed ruling of bankruptcy court (D. Or.) denying non-debtor principal's claim objection against secured creditor who had not filed proof of claim. Secured creditor did not...
Judge(s):
Spraker, Kurtz, Faris
Tag(s):

Limor v. Anderson (In re Scarbrough)

  • Summarized by Thomas DeCarlo , John Steinberger & Associates, PC
  • 7 years 1 week ago
Citation:
18-8028, 2019 WL 1418698 (6th Circuit, Mar 28,2019) Published
Case Status:
Affirmed in part and Reversed in part
Ruling:
Summary Judgment incorrectly entered in action to avoid constructively fraudulent transfer where there were issues of material fact as to whether Debtor was insolvent as of date of the transfer.
Judge(s):
Buchanan, Dales and Opperman
Tag(s):

Raybould v. Markel (In re Raybould)

Citation:
Nos. OR-17-1326-SLB, OR-17-1327-SLB (9th Circuit, Mar 26,2019) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
Bankruptcy case was properly dismissed because debtor failed to obtain credit counseling, to timely make plan payments, and to file required tax returns.
Judge(s):
Spraker, Lafferty, Brand
Tag(s):

Assured Guaranty Corp. v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

Citation:
Nos. 18-1165, 18-1166, 2019 WL 1349221 (1st Circuit, Mar 26,2019) Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
Neither Section 922(d) nor Section 928(a) require debtors to continue payments to bondholders during the pendency of the Title III proceedings.
Judge(s):
Howard, Torruella, Thompson
Tag(s):

Pages

About us in numbers

3943 in the system

3819 Summarized

0 Being Processed