McIntosh v. LaBarge (In re McIntosh)

Citation:
No. 12-6070 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. June 10, 2013)
Ruling:
8th Circuit BAP AFFIRMED the ruling of the Bankruptcy Court affirming Debtor's Second Amended Plan (and rejecting the Debtor's First Amended Plan).
Judge(s):
Kressel, Saladino and Shodeen, Bankruptcy Judges.
Tag(s):

Bullard v. Hyde Park Savings Bank (In re Bullard)

Citation:
Bullard v. Hyde Park Savings Bank (In re Bullard), No. 12-054 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. May 24, 2013)
Ruling:
The B.A.P. affirmed the bankruptcy court's order, finding that the Debtor's "hybrid" plan was not confirmable. The plan proposed to modify several of Hyde Park Bank's (the secured creditor) rights...
Judge(s):
Haines, Tester, and Godoy
Tag(s):

Branigan v. Davis (In re Davis)

Citation:
Branigan v. Davis (In re Davis) Case No. 12-1184 (4th Cir. May 10, 2013)
Ruling:
In two “Chapter 20” cases, the Fourth Circuit affirmed confirmation orders stripping off valueless junior liens against debtors’ property. In a 2-1 ruling, the Court rejected the argument of...
Judge(s):
Before Circuit Judges Paul V. Niemeyer, Barbara Milano Keenan, and Andre M. Diaz. Judge Diaz wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge Niemeyer joined. Judge Keenan wrote a dissenting opinion.
Tag(s):

Drummond v. Welsh (In re Welsh)

Citation:
Case No. 12-60009 (9th Cir. March 25, 2013)
Ruling:
In AFFIRMING the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, which affirmed the bankruptcy court's judgment confirming a chapter 13 plan as proposed in good faith, the Ninth Circuit held that under...
Judge(s):
Kenneth F. Ripple, Stephen S. Trott, and Richard A. Paez
Tag(s):

Meyer v. Scholz (In re Scholz)

Citation:
Meyer v. Scholz (In re Scholz), Case No. 11-60023 (9th Cir. November 15, 2012)
Ruling:
An "anti-anticipation" clause does not preclude inclusion of annuity income in a Chapter 13 debtor's projected disposable income.
Judge(s):
Consuelo M. Callahan and Paul J. Watford, Circuit Judges, and James K. Singelton, Senior District Judge.
Tag(s):

Meyer v. U.S. Trustee (In re Scholz)

Citation:
Ninth Circuit
Ruling:
In short, In re Scholz stands for the proposition that annuity income received by a former railroad employee under the Railroad Retirement Act ("RRA") "must be included when calculating [a...
Judge(s):
Bankruptcy Judge Lee presided over the bankruptcy proceedings. The Bankruptcy Court opinion is found at 427 B.R. 864. Judges Markell, Zive, and Jury presided over the BAP appeal. The BAP opinion, authored by Judge Markell, is found at 447 B.R. 887. Ninth Circuit Judges Callahan and Watford, along with District Court Judge Singleton (sitting by designation) sat on the Ninth Circuit Panel. Judge Watford authored the Ninth Circuit's published opinion.
Tag(s):

Beaulieu v. Ragos (In re Ragos)

Citation:
Beaulieu, v. Ragos (In re: Ragos), Case No. 11-31046 (5th Cir. October 29, 2012)
Ruling:
Social Security income should not be included in a Chapter 13 debtor’s projected disposable income and may be excluded from the debtors’ plan payments. The debtors' retention of exempt social...
Judge(s):
Davis, Dennis and Haynes
Tag(s):

Anderson v. Cranmer (In re Cranmer)

Citation:
Anderson v. Cranmer (In re Cranmer) Case No. 12-4002 (10th Cir. Oct. 24, 2012)
Ruling:
Social Security income need not be included in the calculation of projected disposable income for a Chapter 13 repayment plan. Not including Social Security income in the calculation of projected...
Judge(s):
Murphy (author), Holloway, and O'Brien
Tag(s):

Pages

About us in numbers

3925 in the system

3803 Summarized

0 Being Processed