Home » Chapter 5 » SUBCHAPTER II » § 524

Kvassay v. Kvassay (In re Kvassay)

  • Summarized by Joel Newell , Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, PLC
  • 6 years 8 months ago
Citation:
Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Case No. CC-15-1420-KiTaKu (October 6, 2106) Not for Publication
Ruling:
The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed the bankruptcy court's ruling denying Peter E. Kvassay ("Debtor") motion for order to show cause why Robert V. Kvassay ("Creditor") should not be sanctioned...
Judge(s):
Honorable KIRSCHER, TAYLOR and KURTZ
Tag(s):

Emmert, et al. v. Taggart (In re Taggart)

  • Summarized by Lars Fuller , BakerHostetler
  • 7 years 1 month ago
Citation:
BAP No. OR-15-1119-JuKiF & BAP No. OR-15-1158-JuKiF (BAP 9th Cir. Apr. 12, 2016)
Ruling:
The BAP for the 9th Circuit reversed the ruling of the bankruptcy court (D. Or.) finding appellants in contempt for violating debtor's discharge injunction, finding the bankruptcy court erred by...
Judge(s):
Jury, Kirscher, Faris
Tag(s):

Rafael Velez Fonseca v. Government Employees Association (AEELA)

  • Summarized by Bodie Colwell , Preti Flaherty, LLP
  • 7 years 5 months ago
Citation:
Rafael Velez Fonseca v. Government Employees Association (AEELA), No. 15-033 (1st Cir. B.A.P. Dec. 25, 2015)
Ruling:
The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit AFFIRMS the opinion and order of the bankruptcy court below finding that the bankruptcy court did not err in concluding that (1) AEELA had a...
Judge(s):
Feeney, Deasy and Cary.
Tag(s):

Wheeler v. Collier (In the Matter of Wheeler)

  • Summarized by John Jones , J. R. Jones Law PLLC
  • 8 years 3 months ago
Citation:
Case No. 14-30961 (5th Cir. Mar. 4, 2005)
Ruling:
Fifth Circuit VACATED district court order insofar as it issued criminal sanctions and enjoined law firm because the minute entry was not sufficient notice that the hearing was being held for...
Judge(s):
Smith, Prado and Owen, Circuit Judges
Tag(s):

Yen v. Pedroche (In re Pedroche)

Citation:
BAP No. NC-13-1618-JuKuPa (determined not to be appropriate for publication)
Ruling:
A bankruptcy court is required to hold an evidentiary hearing on whether a creditor is aware of a discharge injunction and whether the creditor is aware that the injunction applies to the...
Judge(s):
Jury, Kurtz, and Pappas.
Tag(s):

Gutierrez v. Coker (In re Gutierrez)

  • Summarized by Bryan Robinson , Law Offices of Bryan Robinson
  • 8 years 9 months ago
Citation:
Gutierrez v. Coker (In re Gutierrez), 9th Cir. B.A.P., NC-13-1469-DJuKu, August 19, 2014 [Not for Publication]
Ruling:
In an unpublished opinion, the 9th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed the order of the bankruptcy court denying the motion for contempt for violation of the discharge injunction...
Judge(s):
DUNN, JURY and KURTZ, Bankruptcy Judges.
Tag(s):

Williams v. King

Citation:
No. 12-3701 (8th Cir. March 5, 2014).
Ruling:
Finding no error in the bankruptcy court’s findings, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy court’s denial of reconsideration of an earlier order imposing sanctions on the appellent for...
Judge(s):
Riley, Bye, and Gruender.
Tag(s):

Chionis v. Starkus (In re Chionis)

  • Summarized by Bryan Robinson , Law Offices of Bryan Robinson
  • 9 years 5 months ago
Citation:
In Re Chionis, 9th Cir. B.A.P., CC-12-1501-KuBaPa (Dec 27, 2013) [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
Ruling:
In an unpublished opinion, the 9th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel UPHELD part of the bankruptcy court finding that Creditor Appellee (Starkus) violated the bankruptcy discharge and the...
Judge(s):
KURTZ, BALLINGER and PAPPAS,
Tag(s):

In re Petrone

  • Summarized by Brendan Gage , Goulston & Storrs PC
  • 9 years 9 months ago
Citation:
Nos. 13–007, 08–12024–DF (B.A.P. 1st Cir. Sept. 11, 2013)
Ruling:
Affirming the United States Bankruptcy Court (“BC”), the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) for the First Circuit affirmed the BC’s order discharging the debtor and denying the debtor’s...
Judge(s):
Lamoutte, Haines, and Deasy, United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judges.
Tag(s):

In re W.R. Grace & Co.

  • Summarized by Valerie Hamilton , Sills Cummis & Gross PC
  • 9 years 10 months ago
Citation:
In re W.R. Grace & Co., Case No. 12-2807 (3d Cir. July 24, 2013) (unpublished)
Ruling:
Co-defendant in asbestos-related litigation lacked standing to object to confirmation of Chapter 11 plan because objector failed to show a specific, identifiable injury that would result from plan...
Judge(s):
Ambro, Fisher and Jordan, Circuit Judges. [Written by Jordan]
Tag(s):

Pages

Bankruptcy News

Commentary: Purdue’s Bankruptcy Deal with Sacklers Raises Bar for Others

Friday: Judges, Practitioners and Trustees to Provide Testimony on Experiences with Subchapter V at First Virtual Public Hearing of ABI's Subchapter V Task Force

Bankrupt Crypto Companies Are Fighting over a Dwindling Pot of Money

Coinbase Accused of Breaking Market Rules as Crypto Crackdown Widens

FTX’s Celebrity, VC Backers to Face Consolidated Suits in Miami

About us in numbers

3530 in the system

3414 Summarized

7 Being Processed