Arlington Capital, LLC v. Bainton McCarthy LLC, et al. (In re GT Automation Group, Inc.)

Citation:
In re GT Automation Group, Inc., No. 1:14-CV-98 (7th Cir. July 8, 2016) (unpublished).
Ruling:
In the bankruptcy context, an appellant lacks standing if it is unable to realize any economic benefit from a potential reversal.
Judge(s):
Posner, Williams, and Pallmeyer (District Judge of the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.)
Tag(s):

Halloum v. McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth (In re Halloum)

Citation:
BAP No. EC-15-1291-DTaJu (BAP 9th Cir. Jun. 28, 2016) (unpublished)
Ruling:
The BAP for the 9th Circuit affirmed the ruling of the bankruptcy court (E.D. Ca.) finding no abuse of discretion in approving a final fee application for debtor's former counsel through a...
Judge(s):
Dunn, Taylor, Jury
Tag(s):

Arnold, et al. v. Arnold (In re Arnold)

Citation:
Arnold, et al. v. Arnold (In re Arnold), Case No. 15-031 (BAP 10th Cir. March 15, 2016). Unpublished.
Ruling:
In an award of attorney’s fees under Colorado’s civil theft statute, bankruptcy court not required to follow the 5th Circuit’s factors enunciated in Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.,...
Judge(s):
Karlin, Cornish, Michael (Cornish)
Tag(s):

Bank of America, N.A. v Horizon Ridge Medical & Corporate Center, LLC (In re Horizon Ridge Medical & Corporate Center, LLC)

Citation:
BAP No. NV-14-1532-DJuKi (BAP 9th Cir. Feb. 23, 2016) (unpublished)
Ruling:
The BAP for the 9th Circuit affirmed the ruling of bankruptcy court (D. Nev.), allowing fees for debtor's second bankruptcy counsel in the amount of $513k, notwithstanding confirmation of the lead...
Judge(s):
Dunn, Jury, Kirscher
Tag(s):

Shalaby v. Mansdorf (In re Nakhuda)

Citation:
BAP No. NC-15-1149-JuKuW (BAP 9th Cir. Feb. 4, 2016)(published)
Ruling:
The BAP for the 9th Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the ruling of the bankruptcy court (N.D. Cal.), sanctioning chapter 7 debtor's counsel by ordering payment to the bankruptcy court...
Judge(s):
Jury, Kurtz, Wanslee
Tag(s):

Lazzo, et al. v. Rose Hill Bank et al. (In re Schupbach Investments, L.L.C.)

Citation:
Lazzo, et al. v. Rose HIll Bank, et al. (In re Schupbach Investments, L.L.C.), Case No. 14-3277 (10th Cir. November 3, 2015). Published.
Ruling:
Approving retroactive employment of debtor’s professionals requires a showing of extraordinary circumstances and simple neglect will not justify nunc pro tunc approval. Upon confirmation of a...
Judge(s):
Tymkovich, Holmes, McHugh (Tymkovich)
Tag(s):

Halloum v. McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP (In re Halloum)

Citation:
9th Cir. BAP Case No. EC-14-1219-JuKuPa (May 19, 2015)
Ruling:
Bankruptcy Court findings of fact were insufficient to support a disputed fee award where Debtor claimed that Counsel had agreed to flat fee of $40,000 for chapter 11 filing. Order awarding fees...
Judge(s):
Jury, Kurtz, and Pappas, Bankruptcy Judges
Tag(s):

Barron & Newburger, P.C. v. TX Skyline, Ltd. (In the Matter of Woerner)

Citation:
Barron & Newburger, P.C. v. Texas Skyline, Ltd. (In re Woerner), --- F.3d ---, Case No. 13-50075 (5th Cir. Apr. 9, 2015)
Ruling:
In this “Anti-Snax” decision by the en banc Court of Appeals, the Fifth Circuit OVERTURNED its retrospective attorney’s-fee rule from In re Pro-Snax Distributors, Inc., 157 F.3d 414 (5th Cir....
Judge(s):
Edward C. Prado writing for the en banc court; Grady Jolly specially concurring
Tag(s):

Rose Hill Bank v. Lazzo (In re Schupbach Investments, LLC)

Citation:
No. KS-13-077 (10th Cir. B.A.P. Nov. 25, 2014)
Ruling:
In accordance with Tenth Circuit precedent, a chapter 11 debtor’s untimely application to employ counsel pursuant to § 327 may only be granted retroactively to the petition date upon a showing...
Judge(s):
Michael, Romero, and Jacobvitz.
Tag(s):

Pages

About us in numbers

3061 in the system

2954 Summarized

0 Being Processed