Now Updating
In re Carol Engen

Summarizing by Bradley Pearce

In re Sisk, Candalla and Mercado

Citation:
18-17445; 18-17446; 18-17447; 18-17448 (9th Circuit, Jun 22,2020) Published
Case Status:
Affirmed in part and Reversed in part
Ruling:
When there is no objection, a chapter 13 plan need not include a fixed duration, because chapter 13 does not expressly prohibit plans with estimated lengths.
Judge(s):
Wardlaw, Smith, Bumatay
Tag(s):

In re Escarcega, et al.

Citation:
NC-16-1333 through -1336, and NC-16-1358 (9th Circuit, Sep 06,2017) Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
In a lengthy opinion, the BAP: (1) held that (a) confirmed Chapter 13 plans could not cannot properly provide the debtors with the right to unilaterally modify the plan without notice and court...
Judge(s):
JURY, FARIS, BRAND, US Bankruptcy Judges
Tag(s):

Pages

About us in numbers

3101 in the system

2987 Summarized

2 Being Processed