Annual Spring Meeting | April 11-14 | Washington, D.C. Register Today View Schedule

Cocoma v. Nigam

Citation:
CO-17-044 and CO-17-045 (10th Circuit, Aug 09,2018) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
Tenth Circuit affirmed the judgment of bankruptcy court denying claims for nondischargeability of debt under 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(2)(A) and (a)(6), which excepts from discharge any debt obtained “for...
Judge(s):
CORNISH, JACOBVITZ, and HALL
Tag(s):

Trost v. Trost

Citation:
17-1877 (6th Circuit, May 30,2018) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
Federal court conversion judgment was entitled to collateral estoppel effect and was excepted from discharge as arising from a "willful and malicious injury" as defined by 11 USC 523(a)(6).
Judge(s):
Moore, Cook, and McKeague
Tag(s):

Fatima v. Stern

Citation:
BAP No. CC-17-1235-LSKu (9th Circuit, May 29,2018) Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
A judgment entered agains the debtor for intentional misrepresentation before the commencement of her Chapter 7 bankruptcy case was sufficient to render the judgment debt nondischargeable under...
Judge(s):
LAFFERTY, SPRAKER, and KURTZ, Bankruptcy Judges
Tag(s):

Donahue v. Poole (In re Poole)

Citation:
CC-16-1439-LTaKu (9th Circuit, Aug 21,2017) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
Affirming the bankruptcy court's decision that plaintiff had failed to carry her burden of proving that a judgment debt, awarded as damages for an accident that occurred while the debtor allegedly...
Judge(s):
LAFFERTY, TAYLOR, KURTZ
Tag(s):

Zeppinick v. Ramirez (In re Zeppinick)

Citation:
CC-16-1293-LKuF (9th Circuit, Apr 24,2017) Not Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
Bankruptcy court did not err in applying issue preclusion to Labor Commissioner's findings or in finding that debt owed to debtor's former employee pursuant to resulting judgment was...
Judge(s):
Lafferty, Kurtz, Faris
Tag(s):

Link v. Mauz (In re Mauz)

Citation:
16-1250 (3rd Circuit, Jan 13,2017) Published
Case Status:
Affirmed
Ruling:
District Court’s order affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s decision holding that a $217,100 debt owed to the Appellees was not dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) was affirmed.
Judge(s):
MCKEE, HARDIMAN, and RENDELL
Tag(s):

Pages

About us in numbers

2877 in the system

2802 Summarized

12 Being Processed