Now Updating
AE OPCO III, LLC, et al v. AAR CORP

Summarizing by Bradley Pearce

Home » Bankruptcy Process and Procedure » Professional Compensation/Fees

Needler v. Casamatta (In re Miller Automotive Group, Inc.)

  • Summarized by Elizabeth Gunn , United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia
  • 10 years 8 months ago
Citation:
Needler v. Casamatta (In re Miller Automotive Group, Inc.), Case No. 14-6047 (8th Cir. B.A.P. August 12, 2015)
Ruling:
Section 350 clearly provides statutory authority to reopen a closed case and there is no requirement that a bankruptcy court must expressly retain jurisdiction when dismissing a case in order to...
Judge(s):
Schermer, Saladino and Shodden (Bankruptcy Judges)
Tag(s):

In re John Wilson

Citation:
In re John Wilson, Case No. 15­-1150 (7th Cir., Aug. 10, 2015)
Ruling:
Affirmed the judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin; the 7th Circuit upheld the fee awarded to the chapter 7 trustee after it was challenged by a creditor.
Judge(s):
Posner, Easterbrook, and Sykes, Circuit Judges
Tag(s):

Watson v. Gill (In re Watson)

  • Summarized by David Hercher , U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Oregon
  • 10 years 9 months ago
Citation:
In re Watson, BAP No. CC-14-1351-DTaKu (9th Cir. B.A.P. June 25, 2015).
Ruling:
The bankruptcy court properly exercised its discretion to approve retroactively a chapter 7 trustee’s employment of a law firm. Not-for-publication memorandum.
Judge(s):
Randall L. Dunn, Laura S. Taylor, and Frank L. Kurtz, Bankruptcy Judges.
Tag(s):

Halloum v. McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP (In re Halloum)

Citation:
9th Cir. BAP Case No. EC-14-1219-JuKuPa (May 19, 2015)
Ruling:
Bankruptcy Court findings of fact were insufficient to support a disputed fee award where Debtor claimed that Counsel had agreed to flat fee of $40,000 for chapter 11 filing. Order awarding fees...
Judge(s):
Jury, Kurtz, and Pappas, Bankruptcy Judges
Tag(s):

Barron & Newburger, P.C. v. TX Skyline, Ltd. (In the Matter of Woerner)

  • Summarized by Aaron Kaufman , Gray Reed LLP
  • 11 years 2 weeks ago
Citation:
Barron & Newburger, P.C. v. Texas Skyline, Ltd. (In re Woerner), --- F.3d ---, Case No. 13-50075 (5th Cir. Apr. 9, 2015)
Ruling:
In this “Anti-Snax” decision by the en banc Court of Appeals, the Fifth Circuit OVERTURNED its retrospective attorney’s-fee rule from In re Pro-Snax Distributors, Inc., 157 F.3d 414 (5th Cir....
Judge(s):
Edward C. Prado writing for the en banc court; Grady Jolly specially concurring
Tag(s):

Peabody v. Jensen (In re Jensen)

  • Summarized by Joel Newell , Ballard Spahr, LLP
  • 11 years 1 month ago
Citation:
CC-13-1606-KiKuD (March 10, 2015) Unpublshed
Ruling:
In the unpublished decision, the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel held that a motion for relief from judgment under Rule 9024 is a contested matter; therefore, the bankruptcy court must...
Judge(s):
KIRSCHER, KURTZ and DUNN, Bankruptcy Judges.
Tag(s):

APJL Consulting, LLC v. Treasures, Inc. (in re Treasures, Inc.)

  • Summarized by Joel Newell , Ballard Spahr, LLP
  • 11 years 1 month ago
Citation:
Nos. SC-13-1304-JuKiKu and SC-13-1464-JuKiKu (related) (9th Cir. BAP March 3, 2015) Unpublished
Ruling:
In the unpublished decision, the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel held that APJL Consulting, LLC ("APJL") was not disinterested and failed to meet its duty of full disclosure, APJL could...
Judge(s):
JURY, KIRSCHER, and KURTZ, Bankruptcy Judges.
Tag(s):

Lei v. Yan (In re Yan)

  • Summarized by Bryan Robinson , Law Offices of Bryan Robinson
  • 11 years 1 month ago
Citation:
Lei v. Yan (In re Yan), 9th Cir. B.A.P (NC-14-1266-JuTaPa), February 26, 2015 [Not for Publication]
Ruling:
In an unpublished opinion the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the 9th Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy court’s denial of creditor motion seeking damages for violations of the automatic stay under...
Judge(s):
JURY, TAYLOR, and PAPPAS, Bankruptcy Judges.
Tag(s):

Pages

About us in numbers

3948 in the system

3821 Summarized

1 Being Processed