Now Updating
Yerian v. Webber (In re: Verian)

Summarizing by Kathleen DiSanto

Scott v. King (In re Amerson)

Citation:
Scott v. King (In re Amerson), Case No. 15-1343 (10th Cir. Oct. 28, 2016)
Ruling:
The exclusion from the bankruptcy estate of an interest in a spendthrift trust under 541(c)(2) is permissive and not mandatory and it is a debtor's choice whether or not to include such interest in...
Judge(s):
Kelly, Briscoe, Gorsuch
Tag(s):

Clabaugh v. Grant (In re Grant)

Citation:
Clabough v. Grant. (In re Grant), Case No. 16-6062 (10th Cir. September 20, 2016). Unpublished
Ruling:
Bankruptcy courts do not have authority to use their equitable powers to disallow exemptions or amendments to exemptions due to bad faith or misconduct; any equitable powers can only be exercised...
Judge(s):
Matheson, McKay, O’Brien
Tag(s):

Rhino Energy LLC v. C.O.P. Coal Development Co. (In re C.W. Mining Co.)

Citation:
Rhino Energy LLC, et al. v. C.O.P Coal Dev. Co., et al. (In re C.W. Mining Co.), Case No. 15-4108 (10th Cir. September 16, 2016).
Ruling:
A District Court’s order is not final if it remands a case to the Bankruptcy Court for significant further proceedings and thus, the 10th Circuit does not have appellate jurisdiction. To qualify...
Judge(s):
Phillips, McHugh, Moritz
Tag(s):

Rajala v. Gardner

Citation:
Rajala v. Garnder, et al., Case No. 14-3241 (10th Cir. August 31, 2016). Unpublished
Ruling:
The scope of § 541 is broad and should be generously construed, and that an interest may be property of the estate even if it is novel or contingent and every conceivable interest of the debtor,...
Judge(s):
Gorsuch, Ebel, Bacharach
Tag(s):

Rindlesbach v. Jones (In re Rindlesbach)

Citation:
Rindlesbach v. Jones, et al. (In re Rindlesbach), Case No. 15-4088 (10th Cir. August 30, 2016). Unpublished
Ruling:
A person must be aggrieved by a bankruptcy court order to be able to seek appellate review of that order and to be aggrieved, that person’s rights or interests must be directly and adversely...
Judge(s):
Hartz, O’Brien, Phillips
Tag(s):

J&R Investment v. Anthony (In re Anthony)

Citation:
J&R Investment v. Anthony (In re Anthony), Case No. 15-4161 (10th Cir. Aug. 29, 2016)
Ruling:
Bankruptcy court did not err in its determination that (1) plaintiff did not meet is prima facie case for revocation of discharge, (2) that the burden of persuasion did not shift to the defendant...
Judge(s):
Hartz, Murphy, and Phillips
Tag(s):

Hatfield v. Thompson (In re Thompson)

Citation:
Hatfield v. Thompson, (In re Thompson), Case No. WO-15-027 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. August 19, 2016). Published
Ruling:
A debt proven under state law on grounds other than fraud can be excepted from discharge under the actual fraud provision of § 523(a)(2)(A) and to establish that a debt is excepted from discharge...
Judge(s):
Romero, Jacobvitz, Mosier (Jacobvitz)
Tag(s):

Flanders v. Lawrence (In re Flanders)

Citation:
Flanders v. Lawrence, et al. (In re Flanders), Case No. 15-1327 (10th Cir. August 5, 2016) Unpublished
Ruling:
The Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars a Federal Court from hearing claims that collaterally attack state court judgments but does not bar claims raised and decided in the State Court from being raised...
Judge(s):
Briscoe, Bacharach, McHugh
Tag(s):

Pages

About us in numbers

2925 in the system

2848 Summarized

18 Being Processed