Now Updating
In re: DAVID C. GOAD

Summarizing by Amir Shachmurove

In re Marcal Paper Mills, Inc.

Citation:
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Case No. No. 09-4574, In re Marcal Paper Mills, Inc., June 16, 2011
Ruling:
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act...
Judge(s):
Sloviter, Hardiman, and Jones
Tag(s):

In re Dr. R.C. Samanta Roy Institute of Science Technology Inc.

Citation:
No. 10-2535, 2011 WL 2350095 (3d Cir. June 15, 2011)
Ruling:
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the dismissal of appellants’ jointly-administered Chapter 11 cases pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b), which provides in part that,...
Judge(s):
SCIRICA, AMBRO and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges
Tag(s):

In re Barbel

Citation:
3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 10-3975, Appeal from the United States District Court of the Virgin Islands, Appellate Division of St. Croix, April 14, 2011
Ruling:
The issue to be decided by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals (the "Third Circuit") was whether the Bankruptcy Court erred in determining that appellant's case should be dismissed pursuant to...
Tag(s):

Huertas v. Galaxy Asset Management

Citation:
3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 10-2532, Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, April 11, 2011
Ruling:
The Court ruled that (1) under New Jersey law, a debtor's debt obligation is not extinguished by the expiration of the statute of limitations, even though the debt is ultimately unenforceable in a...
Tag(s):

In re Caterbone

Citation:
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Case No. No. 07-2151, In re Caterbone, April 4, 2011
Ruling:
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(c)(2) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002, a court lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal where appellant filed...
Judge(s):
Barry, Chagares, and Roth
Tag(s):

In re DVI, Inc. Securities Litigation

Citation:
(Mar. 29, 2011 3d Cir.) (precedential)
Ruling:
To certify a class, the proposed class representative must satisfy each of the four requirements in Rule 23(a)—numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequacy—and the putative class action...
Judge(s):
Sciricia, Ambro and Jones (United Statates District Court judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania sitting by designation)
Tag(s):

In re Fleurantin

Citation:
In re: Fleurantin, No. 09-4376 (3rd Cir. March 24, 2011)
Ruling:
NOTE: Opinion marked " NOT PRECEDENTIAL." The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1) affirmed the District Court’s decision that it lacked jurisdiction to review the...
Judge(s):
Per Curiam
Tag(s):

Pages

About us in numbers

3414 in the system

3292 Summarized

2 Being Processed