Pierce v. Collection Associates, Inc. (In re Pierce)
- Citation:
- No. 14-1365 (8th Cir. B.A.P. Mar. 9, 2015).
- Ruling:
- Transfers sought to be avoided by the debtors as preferential totaled less than $600 in the aggregate, and were therefore subject to the § 547(c)(8) defense for consumer payments. Affirmed.
- Judge(s):
- Colloton, Bright, and Shepherd.
- Tag(s):