The BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court in full. The BAP discussed that bankruptcy court did not error in determining the present value available for distribution or the amount available under a...
The BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court’s denial of confirmation and decision to disallow vehicle operation expense over the value provided by the Local Standards set forth by the Internal Revenue...
While the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying confirmation of the debtor’s plan, the bankruptcy court's failure to make specific findings that the creditors' committee plan...
Section 1129(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code supplants strict enforcement of subordination agreements among creditors, and reduction of less than one percent in the recovery to a dissenting class did...
In reconciling provisions of the Coal Act and the Bankruptcy Code, the Fifth Circuit agrees with the Eleventh Circuit that a debtor coal company's payment obligations under the Coal Act may be...
Before denying a secured creditor's motion for relief from stay in a single asset real estate case based on the creditor's argument that the debtors' plan is unconfirmable, the bankruptcy court...
When there is no objection, a chapter 13 plan need not include a fixed duration, because chapter 13 does not expressly prohibit plans with estimated lengths.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the confirmation of a Chapter 11 Plan that included a limited non-consensual third party release of certain creditors for potential claims arising out of conduct in the...
Judge(s):
Richard A. Paez, Marsha S. Berzon, and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.
In a Chapter 13 plan context, a trustee's objection/argument/requirement at confirmation hearing that would prohibit certain modifications to the plan (such as the so called Molina language,from...
On direct appeal from bankruptcy court, the Sixth Circuit vacated and remanded an order confirming a Chapter 13 plan after the Debtor amended to include her long-standing 401(k) contributions as...
Judge(s):
Clay, Larsen & Readler; Opinion by Larsen; Dissent by Readler